top of page
Writer's pictureOld Patriot

Was There Election Fraud in the 2024 Elections?

Letter #5: A Compelling Case for Election Fraud


A photo of an american flag voting ballot falling apart into flying birds as it is being dropped into a  ballot box by multiple hands, with a stormy sky in the background.
Photo Credit: Lightspring on Shutterstock

Dear Fellow American,


There are clear and undisputable markers of election fraud in the 2024 elections. Concrete proof would require recounts, criminal investigations, and forensic analyses. But why aren't people crying foul?


This is not a “conspiracy theory." It is an honest evaluation of the facts. I'll put it to you like this: if someone showed you viable evidence that your friend's suicide could have actually been a murder, wouldn't you want an investigation?


Well, let's take out the magnifying glass to see what we can find.


 

The case for election fraud


Security experts have weighed in, and their logic can't be ignored. Below are some of the most compelling pieces of evidence for election fraud in the 2024 elections.


Elon Musk's odd $1M per day raffle


A woman holding up a $1M dollar check from America PAC and standing next to Elon Musk
Photo Credit: nbcnews.com

Starting in October 2024, Elon Musk's super PAC, America PAC, began giving away $1M per day in a blitzkrieg attempt to obtain detailed personal information about swing state voters. Some argued it was illegal, but he wasn't paying people to vote.


Instead, he was paying them to submit their voter information, and confirming they supported the constitution. How curious, right?


More interestingly, this offer was only valid in swing states, and to this day people are claiming they're receiving $100 checks from Musk for signing the America PAC petition - even those who never signed it. Fraud alert.


And do you mean to tell me that the richest man in the world, who it now appears will soon be co-president of the United States of America, spent millions of dollars for a pool of swing state voters in order to do...nothing?


I doubt even his friends at the “Mar-a-Lago White House" would believe that one.


 

Hacked voting systems


An ExpressVote machine is seen during early voting at a polling station at the Black Mountain Public Library in Black Mountain, North Carolina on October 21, 2024
Photo Credit: abcnews.com

Within 10 days of the 2024 elections, a team of security experts (listed above) sent a letter to VP Kamala Harris, providing their justifications for a recount based on documented severe voting system breaches from 2020 (perpetrated by Trump).


The experts were referencing a Georgia court case, where mountains of evidence emerged that attorneys hired by Donald Trump employed operatives to breach statewide voting systems in Georgia, in which they succeeded. In fact, they were even shown to have made copies of the software.


By the way, that software was for central voting servers, tabulators, and highly restricted databases that account for 70% of voting systems nationwide.


These experts go on to further explain that the copied software could have been used to create working replicas that could be installed on voting equipment with minimal physical access to them by unskilled accomplices.


 

Musk offered free Starlink internet to swing states for the 2024 elections


Vast Space Station Photo
Vast Space Station: Photo Credit: spacenews.com

Stephen Spoonamore, a cyber-security adviser and government contractor, went further in his letter, outlining the method he believes could have been used to perpetrate the act, summarized as follows:


  • Starlink was used to monitor ePollBook data (ePollBook data is used by election officials to track voter registration information for an election, but it does not count votes and is connected to the internet).

  • The monitored data was then used to evaluate voters against Musk's America PAC database.

  • False ballots were somehow (this is where it gets tricky) updated into the voting systems using the nonvoters from the America PAC petition.


It's not a question of whether Musk could have had the malware to pull off such a stunt. We know that the voting software was copied years ago. The question is whether or not he had the ability to get that software onto the voting machines.


 

Possible Starlink Manipulation


One suggestion by Spoonamore was that Starlink was used to insert the votes. This has been debunked by the media. David Becker, founder and executive director of The Center for Election Innovation and Research, stated:

“This, quite simply, did not happen, and could not happen, thanks to the security measures we have in place, and these conspiracy theories echo other disinformation we’ve heard over the past several years.”

Spoonamore countered this with:

“It’s a lie that these machines aren’t connected to the internet. They're not supposed to be connected to the internet while they're doing tabulation—but you don't know what was loaded in there for the software.”

I do find it questionable that Elon Musk was gracious enough to offer free Starlink services in swing states for a smoother election process. I don't think anyone at this point could call him a disinterested party (or a good samaritan).


But, while it could have been used, Starlink wasn't necessary for the machine corruption. As stated in the first open letter:

“Skilled adversaries could study it [the stolen software] for vulnerabilities and develop malware designed to be installed with minimal physical access to the voting equipment by unskilled accomplices to manipulate the vote counts."

And this brings us to the Russian bomb threats.


 

Russian bomb threats


Not a single one of the bomb threats made during the 2024 elections was deemed credible by the FBI. So then what was their purpose?


As a twist, according to ABC news, 56 of the 67 locations that received bomb threats were in ONLY 11 counties, all of which voted for Biden in 2020, including the 8 most populated in: Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Detroit, Michigan; Phoenix, Arizona; Atlanta, Georgia; and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.



A chart of 2024 election bomb threat data.
2024 Election Bomb Threat Data. Source: NBC News

How bizarre it is that the locations most in need of corrupting by the Trump campaign were the same ones where the bomb threats occurred. The coincidences are piling up, and this is quickly turning into the most credible "conspiracy theory" I've ever come across.


 

Other strange anomalies


Did you know that Trump is the first person in four decades to win all seven swing states? And he managed to do so without record voter turnout. In an article written by Rachel Donald, she quotes one data scientist who, after crunching the numbers, states:

“It’s north of a 35 billion to 1 probability that you could win seven out of seven outside of recount range with less than 50% of the vote.”

And to follow this up further with her quote from Spoonamore:

“This is not scattershot. It's their big mistake—if they've made a mistake, it's that it’s just too perfect,”

Compare this with the pre-election claims by both Musk and Trump that they "already had the votes" they needed, and combine it with the absurd Polymarket "prophecy" (against the evidence) that Trump would win, and you have one stinking horse pile.


Walks like a duck. Talks like a duck. Farts like a duck. It's probably a duck.


 

The Impossibility of Voting Machine Corruption


I've come across several articles that write this off as a conspiracy theory, but honestly, they're absurd. Mostly, they seem to say that it would be impossible to corrupt voting machines without anyone noticing.


In my opinion, anyone who claims that something can't be hacked is either a complete idiot or has an ulterior motive (even if that ulterior motive may be a good one, such as calming the masses).


Even the future co-president, Elon Musk, agrees:


A June 2024 Musk tweet, stating, "anything can be hacked."
June 2024 X post. Source: X

My claim is simple: there are enough indications that election fraud occurred in the 2024 elections to justify an investigation. If, after reading this article, you disagree, then I suppose there isn't anything I could say to convince you otherwise.


But to say that election fraud is impossible, that all of these coincidences involving the richest man in the world (and renowned tech magnate, who stands to gain immeasurably) are just simple coincidences, is ludicrous.  


And to assume that this richest man in the world (and renowned tech magnate), in collusion with foreign entities, while having years with which to manipulate the stolen voting system software, couldn't stump election authorities, is equally ludicrous.


There aren't many things money can't buy. Countries and elections have been purchased wholesale many times throughout history. How do we know that key people weren't bought off to look the other way from discrepancies? Ignoring evidence is simply negligence and nothing more.


 

Psychological warfare


Perhaps the most brilliant part of this all (if it happened) would be the psychological nature of it. Trump incited the J6 riot, insisting (with far less - zero - evidence) that the 2020 election was stolen from him.


Now, the mere word "election fraud" is viewed in this country with hostility. For those still feeling the trauma of the J6 riot, someone claiming election fraud could easily be labeled a "kook," or a "conspiracy theorist."


But that is irrational emotion, not dispassionate logic.


 

Final note

With all of the above being the case, I wonder why there hasn't already been a recount and investigation. Granted, without the investigation, there really is no way to verify any of this, and it will only ever remain a "conspiracy theory."


What I can say is this: Donald Trump, if he did just get away with the theft of the century, has no plans of stepping down in 2028. American democracy, as we know it, would be over, and we will have entered into a new era of American oligarchic authoritarianism to an extent this country never dreamed possible.


We can trust him when he says that Americans "are not gonna have to vote again." He is an astoundingly simple man with outspoken motives. I say we believe him.



Your Faithful Friend,

Old Patriot


 


PS - If you enjoyed this content, please press the heart, subscribe, and spread the word. Thank you for reading!


 
  1. Brian Schwartz, “How an Elon Musk PAC is using voter data to help Trump beat Harris in 2024 election,” CNBC, (August 2, 2024). Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/02/elon-musk-pac-voter-data-trump-harris.html


  2. Jordan Liles, “Claims in 'Duty to Warn' Letter to Harris Alleging Compromised Election Are Misleading,” Snopes, (November 22, 2024). Available at: https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/11/21/stephen-spoonamore-letter-harris/


  3. Leah Sarnoff, “Election fact check: How voting machines work and why they're hard to hack,” ABC News, (October 30, 2024). Available at: https://abcnews.go.com/US/election-fact-check-voting-machines-work-hard-hack/story?id=114902274


  4. Associated Press, “FACT FOCUS: Election Officials Knock Down Starlink Vote Rigging Conspiracy Theories,” US News, (November 12, 2024). Available at: https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/nevada/articles/2024-11-12/fact-focus-election-officials-knock-down-starlink-vote-rigging-conspiracy-theories


  1. Zachary Cohen & Sara Murray, “Exclusive: Georgia prosecutors have messages showing Trump’s team is behind voting system breach,” CNN, (August 15, 2023). Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/13/politics/coffee-county-georgia-voting-system-breach-trump/index.html

81 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
Something patriotic.jpg

Stay tuned in the fight against the far right.

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page